You are the executive CEO of a successful owner operated enterprise in Phenix, your business generates over $500K EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes), you feel like there is potential for more and you intend to take your company to the next level? If this is you schedule a call with one of our executive coaches to estimate the ROI of executive coaching for your business.
How to motivate a sales team
The implications of shadow coaching style of leadership
Typically managers think they are already coaching when in reality what they are doing is a lot of telling, instructing, directing, teaching, advising, and in the worst case, micromanaging. They use the phrase 'coaching' to describe just about any conversation they have with a team member although it does not really apply. First managers need to learn the definition of coaching. Here is the secret of coaching: Allow people to perform on their own and give them space for doing so. Like this managers give team members permission to do their jobs and do them well. People will rise to the expectations the management has of them.
What results coaching can do for you
How can managers ask the right questions for appreciative inquiry
A manager on the path to becoming an effective coach for his / her employees coaching cultivates commitment to improving the organization without imposing an issue based orientation or sense of a general feeling of pessimism or despondency on employees. Instead, employees are recognized for what they already do well and encouraged to apply these strengths in such a way that facilitates performance and growth. According to Nelson et al., 2002 targets are met faster when a vision-focused, cohesive taskforce collaborates and deploys the employees' best sides, talents and strengths toward a common objective. Job satisfaction, good morale is key. According to Edmondson, 2002 the manager needs to do his / her best to get rid of fear in the workplace by assisting employees generate purpose within their role, function and responsibility inside an organization.
Where to get leadership coaching for results?
The importance of having coaching frameworks
Each manager or coach has a unique approach to coaching subordinates. It's important for the manager to develop his / her own framework to use when coaching each employee. The manager's framework should guide the conversations the manager has with a team member. But independent from whatever those frameworks might look like, When those team members come up with their own solutions, they are more committed, and the fixes are more likely to be implemented. Furthermore, this issue-solving experience helps team members develop the self-confidence to solve similar issues on their own in the future so that the manager's coaching framework has less significance in the current situation.
Leadership coaching vs executive coaching
The overlooked coach potential in leadership
For team leaders who are used to tackling performance issues by directing and instructing employees what to do, a coaching approach often feels too slow and time consuming. Furthermore, in their perception coaching can make them psychologically vulnerable, because it deprives them of deploying their authority approach they are so used to and very comfortable with. So they resist the implementation of coaching and don't even try it. Common excuses are “I’m too busy now,” or they will find other excuses like “This isn’t the best use of my time,” or “these employees aren’t coachable.”. According to Daniel Goleman’s study of leadership styles, leaders ranked coaching as their least-favorite leadership style, justifying it with the excuse that they simply would not have time for the slow and tedious work of coaching people and assisting them grow from within.
How to find an executive coach
How to replace bad leadership qualities with good ones
More professionals sense the need to coach their teams in order to get the best performance of their team members. Like in any relationship, coaching is built on mutual respect and trust. The employee must trust the manager to guide him/her though a strategic mental process. That thinking process becomes more beneficial when information is shared openly. Studies have shown that nine out of 10 executives have the intent to assist their direct report improve performance. On the other hand role-plays simulating a coaching situation demonstrated much room for improvement. Cooperative Coaching leadership style involves listening and asking opposed to authoritative leadership style consisting of just selling and telling. But that coaching approach is contrary to the manager's instincts because deep down the managers have already made up their minds about the solution to a specific issue well before the managers even begin looking at the problem together with the employee. So often those coaching efforts get quickly reduced to just trying to get agreement on what the manager had already in mind and decided. This cannot be construed as real coaching and therefore the outcomes are no better than when authoritative leadership is deployed.
What is the ROI of executive coaching?
How managers can transform into effective coaches of employees
Managers are called to employ a strengths-based approach to developing their staff. When team members know their strengths and can consistently build on their work from those strengths, leaders and their teams can forge better-functioning work-environments. Coaching employees focuses on revealing and developing each team member's unique strengths. Enhancing each employee's capabilities may assist establishing an even more talented workforce. Furthermore, employees who feel energized and motivated by their leader may feel more driven to do their job very well. Coaching is an effective management tool for managers to implement in their efforts to assist employees generate results, and especially help employees improve their skills and their potential opportunities for promotion to next upper level kind of positions.
What are the effects of leadership coaching?
The overlooked coach potential in leadership
For team leaders who are used to tackling performance issues by directing and instructing employees what to do, a coaching approach often feels too slow and time consuming. Furthermore, in their perception coaching can make them psychologically vulnerable, because it deprives them of deploying their authority approach they are so used to and very comfortable with. So they resist the implementation of coaching and don't even try it. Common excuses are “I’m too busy now,” or they will find other excuses like “This isn’t the best use of my time,” or “these employees aren’t coachable.”. According to Daniel Goleman’s study of leadership styles, leaders ranked coaching as their least-favorite leadership style, justifying it with the excuse that they simply would not have time for the slow and tedious work of coaching people and assisting them grow from within.
Specialised executive coaching for startups
How to motivate a team at workplace
For true leaders it is important to place intention on building individual competencies and responsibilities that arise from collaboration with team members. They lay the foundation for goal achievement with each member of the team. According to Tackx & Verdin, 2014, including team members in decision-making, goal-setting, and strategy development will lead to the sensation of ownership over processes that will motivate even beyond the regular. Leaders that develop effective coaching skills help their team members achieve personal or professional goals. In a managerial or leadership function, effective coaching skills tend to support sustainable change in behaviors and thinking patterns while enhancing skill sets and facilitating personal growth, education and development.
Specialised executive coaching for startups
Has coaching become the sixth management function?
Everybody involved in management should know about the five management functions. French mining engineer Henri Fayol defined the role of a manager as consisting of five functions of management: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Another theorist, Luther Gulick, chunked commanding and controlling into one function being directing and added staffing, reporting, and budgeting, also known as POSDCORB, which is still used nowadays in management. So, how does coaching and leading fit into all of this? Leadership is one of the most vital management functions completely overlooked by these theorists. For the realisation of a mission an effective leader has to provide clarity, guidance and purpose. Without it any mission is set for failure. This can be accomplished best by switching from commanding and directing to a non directive leadership style.
What are the best executive coaching firms?
When using coaching as a leadership development tool
Coaching managers should perceive coaching as something broader than just the efforts of exterior coaches who are hired to help executives build their personal and professional skills. That work is important and sometimes vital, but it’s temporary and executed by outsiders. The kind of coaching managers should implement is the one that establishes a real learning organization with ongoing coaching that is executed by people inside the organization. It is an activity that all managers should participate in with all their subordinates on an ongoing basis, in such a manner that helps define the organization’s culture and its mission. An effective coaching manager as a leader asks questions instead of providing answers, supports team members instead of judging them, facilitates their growth and leadership instead of dictating what has to be done, asks for ideas from all team members on how to solve the situation instead of just relying on own attempts to solve it individually. A coaching manager with cooperative leadership style can approach any obstacle with a calm, objective and clear focus. A deeper understanding of issues and solution-focused fact finding creates the blueprints for resolutions.
Which is the best coaching company?
Has coaching become the sixth management function?
Everybody involved in management should know about the five management functions. French mining engineer Henri Fayol defined the role of a manager as consisting of five functions of management: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Another theorist, Luther Gulick, chunked commanding and controlling into one function being directing and added staffing, reporting, and budgeting, also known as POSDCORB, which is still used nowadays in management. So, how does coaching and leading fit into all of this? Leadership is one of the most vital management functions completely overlooked by these theorists. For the realisation of a mission an effective leader has to provide clarity, guidance and purpose. Without it any mission is set for failure. This can be accomplished best by switching from commanding and directing to a non directive leadership style.
Looking for a professional leadership coach?
How to replace bad leadership qualities with good ones
More professionals sense the need to coach their teams in order to get the best performance of their team members. Like in any relationship, coaching is built on mutual respect and trust. The employee must trust the manager to guide him/her though a strategic mental process. That thinking process becomes more beneficial when information is shared openly. Studies have shown that nine out of 10 executives have the intent to assist their direct report improve performance. On the other hand role-plays simulating a coaching situation demonstrated much room for improvement. Cooperative Coaching leadership style involves listening and asking opposed to authoritative leadership style consisting of just selling and telling. But that coaching approach is contrary to the manager's instincts because deep down the managers have already made up their minds about the solution to a specific issue well before the managers even begin looking at the problem together with the employee. So often those coaching efforts get quickly reduced to just trying to get agreement on what the manager had already in mind and decided. This cannot be construed as real coaching and therefore the outcomes are no better than when authoritative leadership is deployed.
Who is the best leadership development coach?
Today's role of coaching in organizational development
With fast, continuous and disruptive change being the biggest constant in business, a great leader just cannot build exclusively on what worked in the past because with new parameters due to change there is just no guarantee that this will still work these days. Managers simply cannot and should not expect to have all the right answers and must adapt to new conditions and collaborate with specialised teams. To cope with this new reality, enterprises are ditching traditional command-and-control practices and replace those with a model in which managers give support and guidance rather than instructions, and subordinates adapt to constantly changing environments in ways that unleash fresh empowerment, identification with the mission, energy, motivation, innovation, dedication and commitment. Studies have shown a nice side effect being that coaching managers found themselves learning themselves throughout the process of coaching in collaboration with their staff. A dyadic relationship with subordinates is key for the coaching manager to perform effectively his leadership.
The top executive coaches reveal
How to develop strategic leadership skills
The manager's task is to assist his staff more broadly and more deeply. Sometimes it is sufficient to ask something as simple as “If you had a magic wand, what would you do?” to open up the conversation and put everyting on wide-angle. You’d be surprised how freeing many people find that question to be—and how quickly they then start thinking and generating fresh, productive ideas. Once they’ve opened up their perspective and discovered new options looking at things, the manager's job is to prompt them to deepen their thinking, perhaps by making them explore the upside, the downside, and the risks of each approach.
